DC2004-01-001 — Private Sector Participation in Existing NPC-SPUG Areas
Department Circular No. DC2004-01-001, issued 26 January 2004 by DOE Secretary Vicente S. Pérez, Jr. Prescribes the rules and procedures for private sector participation in existing Small Power Utilities Group (NPC-SPUG) areas pursuant to Rule 13 of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 (EPIRA-IRR).
Background and rationale
Follows State policy to ensure total electrification of the country [DC2004-01-001, Whereas clauses, 2004-01]. Implements EPIRA Rule 13 §1 mandate that DOE issue guidelines on private capital inflow and third-party participation in missionary electrification [DC2004-01-001, Whereas clauses, 2004-01]. NPC-SPUG, under EPIRA-IRR §3, must periodically assess commercial viability and private sector participation opportunities [DC2004-01-001, Whereas clauses, 2004-01]. Private sector participation reduces burden on the Universal Charge Missionary Electrification component (UC-ME), funded from missionary area revenues and the Universal Charge itself [DC2004-01-001, Whereas clauses, 2004-01].
Scope and key definitions
Applies to all areas currently served by NPC-SPUG [DC2004-01-001, §2(a), 2004-01]. Defines 18 foundational terms [DC2004-01-001, §1, 2004-01]:
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Commercially Viable | Area/service where True Cost Generation Rate ≤ Socially Acceptable Generation Rate |
| Conclusion Program | Program setting UC-ME availability duration to NPP from area takeover effectivity |
| Floor Price | Price at which NPC-SPUG will sell asset to winning NPP; set by independent appraiser (fair value) or book value |
| Graduate | Area where Missionary Electrification Subsidy is removed due to commercial viability |
| Missionary Electrification | Basic electricity provision in Unviable Areas, aiming toward viability |
| Missionary Electrification Subsidy | ERC-approved subsidy paid to NPP to recover True Cost Generation Rate while charging Distribution Utility the Socially Acceptable Rate; funded from UC-ME per NPC-SPUG petition |
| New Private Provider (NPP) | Competitively-selected entity technically and financially capable to serve/take over NPC-SPUG areas |
| NPC-SPUG | Functional unit of NPC pursuing Missionary Electrification |
| NPC-SPUG Area | Geographic area currently supplied electricity by NPC-SPUG |
| Socially Acceptable Generation Rate | Rate ERC deems socially desirable for Distribution Utility to pay for power; combined with Missionary Electrification Subsidy, equals True Cost Generation Rate |
| True Cost Generation Rate | Full efficient generation costs in an area, determined per EPIRA §43(f) basis (just and reasonable costs + reasonable RORB) |
| Unviable Area | Geographic area within Distribution Utility franchise where immediate distribution line extension is not feasible |
Policy declaration and private sector eligibility
All existing NPC-SPUG areas are declared open for private sector participation, defined as “take over of electricity supply via outright purchase or lease of existing NPC-SPUG assets, and/or installation of new power generating facilities including associated power delivery systems” [DC2004-01-001, §2(b), 2004-01]. NPC-SPUG shall endeavor to privatize generation facilities and power delivery systems [DC2004-01-001, §2(c), 2004-01]. When NPC-SPUG ceases area service, it may sell assets or redeploy; asset sales follow government standard accounting procedures [DC2004-01-001, §2(d), 2004-01]. Distribution utilities sourcing wholly or partly from NPC-SPUG are encouraged to seek NPPs via competitive bidding to minimize power purchase cost [DC2004-01-001, §2(e), 2004-01].
Fallback mechanism: where Distribution Utility does not select an NPP, NPC-SPUG assigns its existing Power Supply Agreement (PSA) to a competitively-selected NPP if this reduces total power supply cost [DC2004-01-001, §2(f), 2004-01]. DOE shall promote governance strengthening (investor protection, consumer education) in NPP-taken-over areas [DC2004-01-001, §2(g), 2004-01]. DOE prescribes the Conclusion Program to optimize UC-ME utilization in areas taken over by NPPs [DC2004-01-001, §2(h), 2004-01].
Competitive selection of New Private Providers
Competitive process shall select one or more NPPs to supply each NPC-SPUG area [DC2004-01-001, §3(a), 2004-01]. Process must ensure prospective NPPs possess adequate financial and technical capacity; design shall balance lowest long-term power cost/services, environmental compatibility, and advantageous implementation schedule [DC2004-01-001, §3(b), 2004-01].
Distribution Utilities have three options for managing competitive selection [DC2004-01-001, §3(c), 2004-01]:
- Request DOE to secure or engage a Transaction Advisor (at Utility’s own cost) to assist in NPP selection [DC2004-01-001, §3(c)(i), 2004-01]
- Allow NPC-SPUG to assign existing PSA to NPP via competitive process [DC2004-01-001, §3(c)(ii), 2004-01]
- Manage competitive selection themselves [DC2004-01-001, §3(c)(iii), 2004-01]
Wave-based grouping: Utilities in NPC-SPUG areas are grouped into ‘waves’ based on area suitability for NPP supply [DC2004-01-001, §3(d)(i), 2004-01]. First wave includes areas most attractive to NPPs or causing greatest NPC-SPUG losses [DC2004-01-001, §3(d)(i), 2004-01]. DOE notifies wave utilities to select one of three options; Utilities have two (2) months to notify DOE and NPC-SPUG of choice; failure to notify results in deemed selection of option §3(c)(ii) [DC2004-01-001, §3(d)(ii), 2004-01]. Any Utility may self-nominate for first wave [DC2004-01-001, §3(d)(iii), 2004-01]. Utilities selecting option §3(c)(iii) are monitored for progress parity with options §3(c)(i) or (ii); if significantly delayed, DOE may offer §3(c)(i) or assign §3(c)(ii) [DC2004-01-001, §3(d)(iv), 2004-01].
Once NPP is selected, NPC-SPUG assigns, amends, or terminates PSA with Distribution Utility to provide smooth, efficient transition [DC2004-01-001, §3(e), 2004-01]. NPC-SPUG must prepare and submit proposed groupings/waves to DOE within one (1) month of Circular effectivity [DC2004-01-001, §3(f), 2004-01].
Asset disposal procedures
NPC-SPUG disposes of surplus assets once NPP is in place and NPC-SPUG phases out area supply [DC2004-01-001, §4(a), 2004-01].
Generation assets: Generation and other NPC-SPUG assets (excluding subtransmission) are disposed via three-step process [DC2004-01-001, §4(b), 2004-01]:
- NPC-SPUG offers winning NPP right to purchase at Floor Price (set by independent appraiser per fair value or book value); purchase option and Floor Price included in PSA bidding documents [DC2004-01-001, §4(b)(i)–(ii), 2004-01]
- If NPP declines purchase at Floor Price, NPC-SPUG may redeploy asset to another NPC-SPUG area [DC2004-01-001, §4(b)(iii), 2004-01]
- Otherwise, within two (2) months, NPC-SPUG auctions assets via open, ascending bidding; winning NPP may participate [DC2004-01-001, §4(b)(iii), 2004-01]
Subtransmission assets: Four-step process [DC2004-01-001, §4(c), 2004-01]:
- NPC-SPUG first offers to relevant Distribution Utility per EPIRA §8, EPIRA-IRR Rule 6, and ERC guidelines (17 October 2003) on TRANSCO subtransmission asset sales/franchising, including revenue-potential-based disposal value determination [DC2004-01-001, §4(c)(i), 2004-01]
- If Distribution Utility declines, NPC-SPUG offers to Distribution Utility consortium or TRANSCO at same price [DC2004-01-001, §4(c)(ii), 2004-01]
- If no buyer found, NPC-SPUG endeavors to enter O&M contract with relevant Distribution Utility; Utility assumes operating/maintenance responsibility [DC2004-01-001, §4(c)(iii), 2004-01]
- If NPC-SPUG retains ownership, it reviews/optimizes operating costs and petitions ERC for rate increase to cover full O&M costs [DC2004-01-001, §4(c)(iv), 2004-01]
Regulatory framework for NPP participation
NPC-SPUG shall petition ERC for regulatory regime encouraging private participation, with eight key characteristics [DC2004-01-001, §5(a)(i), 2004-01]:
- NPPs supplying taken-over NPC-SPUG areas may charge True Cost Generation Rates [DC2004-01-001, §5(a)(i)(1), 2004-01]
- Rates established via competitive bidding for least cost, or via Best New Entrant tariff benchmarking where competitive bidding ineffective [DC2004-01-001, §5(a)(i)(2), 2004-01]
- Where DOE deems True Cost Rate too high for social acceptability, NPC-SPUG petitions ERC to set Socially Acceptable Rate and Missionary Electrification Subsidy (difference between True Cost and Socially Acceptable); subsidy funded from UC-ME [DC2004-01-001, §5(a)(i)(3), 2004-01]
- Socially Acceptable Rate may increase with area development; Subsidy correspondingly decreases [DC2004-01-001, §5(a)(i)(4), 2004-01]
- Area is deemed Commercially Viable (and “Graduated”) when Socially Acceptable Rate ≥ True Cost Rate; NPC-SPUG no longer petitions subsidy [DC2004-01-001, §5(a)(i)(5), 2004-01]
- ERC determines subsidy to be paid NPP serving area and corresponding Socially Acceptable Rate [DC2004-01-001, §5(a)(i)(6), 2004-01]
- If subsidy is provided, NPP required by regulation and/or PSA terms to reduce charges to Distribution Utility commensurate with subsidy; tariff revenue + subsidy together equal True Cost Rate [DC2004-01-001, §5(a)(i)(7), 2004-01]
- NPP serving taken-over NPC-SPUG area always retains right to charge True Cost Rate if not receiving subsidy covering difference between True Cost and Socially Acceptable rates [DC2004-01-001, §5(a)(i)(8), 2004-01]
NPC-SPUG shall assist Distribution Utilities in entering PSAs with NPPs [DC2004-01-001, §5(b), 2004-01]. NPC-SPUG shall ensure New Missionary Areas are served by Qualified Third Parties (QTPs) where possible, by NPC-SPUG directly otherwise [DC2004-01-001, §5(c), 2004-01]. NPC-SPUG shall ensure payment of UC-ME subsidies to entities qualified per ERC determination [DC2004-01-001, §5(d), 2004-01].
Non-retroactivity and effec tivity
Circular does not apply to PSAs where tariff rates were approved by ERC before Circular’s effectivity date [DC2004-01-001, §6, 2004-01]. Effective upon complete publication in a newspaper of general circulation [DC2004-01-001, §9, 2004-01].
Full text: Cleaned copy