PEP 2023-2050 Investment Requirements

The Philippine Energy Plan 2023-2050 projects total energy sector investment requirements across three scenarios for the period 2023–2050, expressed in Philippine Pesos at 2022 constant prices [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, Table 2, p.28, 2023].

Headline Totals

ScenarioTotal (PhP B)Total (USD B @ PhP55/USD)Jobs Created
REF19,646.0357.21,441,999
CES-127,810.5505.62,174,185
CES-231,336.1569.72,499,984

CES-1 is 41.6% higher than REF; CES-2 is 12.7% above CES-1 [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.28, 2023].

Upstream Investment (PhP Billion)

SectorREF 2023-28REF 2029-50CES-1 2023-28CES-1 2029-50CES-2 2023-28CES-2 2029-50
Oil and Gas345.661,978.97345.661,978.97345.661,978.97
Coal272.75161.51272.75161.51272.75161.51
RE (Pre-Dev)6.4528.867.1321.447.2822.41

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, Table 2, p.28, 2023]

Power Sector

By 2028, power capacity additions: REF 18,528 MW (PhP 1,597.9B) / CES-1 18,195 MW (PhP 1,850.8B) / CES-2 19,656 MW (PhP 1,945.3B) [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.31, 2023].

From 2029–2050: REF 104,180 MW (PhP 7,029.6B) / CES-1 111,486 MW (PhP 9,852.2B) / CES-2 113,277 MW (PhP 13,282.2B) [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.31, 2023].

BESS investment from 2029–2050: REF PhP 56.4B vs CES-1 PhP 744.1B vs CES-2 PhP 899.9B — reflecting the storage requirements of high-OSW scenarios [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, Table 2, p.28, 2023].

Electric Vehicles and Charging Stations

The largest CES-vs-REF divergence is in EV and EVCS investment [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.31-32, 2023]:

PeriodSegmentREFCES-1 / CES-2
2023-2028EVsPhP 297.0BPhP 1,717.3B
2023-2028EVCSPhP 17.8BPhP 66.4B
2029-2050EVsPhP 5,829.3BPhP 11,072.6B
2029-2050EVCSPhP 1,830.8BPhP 288.8B

The REF targets 10% EV fleet share by 2050; CES targets 50% (under CREVI ) [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.31, 2023].

Employment Generation

RE power plant construction is the dominant job source under all scenarios [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, Table 3, p.28, 2023]:

SectorREFCES-1CES-2
RE upstream pre-development49,41165,709115,173
RE power plants1,152,5331,437,1391,688,331
EVs117,243431,681431,681
BESS23,194139,898156,838

Government Role

The DOE envisions a facilitating role — policy support mechanisms to attract private sector and PPP financing. Investment projections exclude transmission infrastructure (see Transmission Development Plan (TDP) for the Transmission Development Plan). The CEFI Roadmap / CEFIM Programme and the Clean Energy Finance Framework are the primary vehicles for mobilizing this investment [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.28, 2023].


Power Generation Investment by Technology (Vol. II Detail)

Vol. II Table 57 provides technology-level breakdowns for power generation investment at 2022 constant prices [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. II, Table 57, 2023]:

Capacity Additions (MW)

TechnologyREF 2023-28CES-1 2023-28CES-2 2023-28REF 2029-50CES-1 2029-50CES-2 2029-50
Coal2,3052,3052,305
Natural Gas2,4132,4132,41319,46813,57616,444
Oil-based202020
Nuclear (Other Technologies)4,8004,800
Renewables (all)13,79113,45814,91984,71293,11092,033
— Biomass42122122501616
— Geothermal425425425930580580
— Solar9,3286,2316,23145,62046,93427,890
— Hydropower2957707709,9706,0305,410
— Onshore Wind3,7003,9105,37121,34222,05010,037
— Offshore Wind2,0002,0006,80017,50048,100
BESS (excl. from total)2,0802,0802,0801,54419,77922,426
Total (excl. BESS)18,52818,19519,656104,180111,486113,277

Investment Cost (PhP Billion @ 2022 prices)

TechnologyREF 2023-28CES-1 2023-28CES-2 2023-28REF 2029-50CES-1 2029-50CES-2 2029-50
Coal350.55334.38334.38
Natural Gas253.42253.42253.421,447.04977.321,201.88
Oil-based2.182.182.18
Nuclear1,738.601,738.60
Renewables (all)928.131,197.251,291.685,526.236,392.239,441.83
— Offshore Wind329.37329.37964.782,483.186,924.06
BESS63.6063.6063.6056.35744.05899.88
Total1,597.871,850.821,945.267,029.629,852.2013,282.18

Key CES divergence in generation: OSW investment in 2029-2050 reaches PhP964.78B (REF, 6.8 GW) vs PhP2,483B (CES-1, 17.5 GW) vs PhP6,924B (CES-2, 48.1 GW) — by far the largest single-technology investment differential across scenarios.

CES-1 total generation investment is 35.6% higher than REF (PhP11.7T vs PhP8.6T); CES-2 is 76.5% higher than REF (PhP15.2T vs PhP8.6T), driven almost entirely by offshore wind [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. II, p.110, 2023].

Power Sector Employment by Technology (Vol. II Detail)

Vol. II Table 58 provides technology-level job projections for 2023-2050 [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. II, Table 58, 2023]:

TechnologyConstruction Jobs/MWO&M Jobs/MWREF 2023-28CES-1 2023-28REF 2029-50CES-1 2029-50CES-2 2029-50
Coal2.500.657,2617,261
Natural Gas2.730.136,9016,90155,67838,82747,030
Nuclear5.1024,48024,480
Solar10.831.70116,88078,074571,619588,083588,083
Hydropower8.330.552,6206,83888,53453,54648,041
Onshore Wind4.830.2118,63319,691107,478111,04450,546
Offshore Wind12.284.8234,204116,292299,282822,597
BESS4.901.5013,31213,3129,882126,586143,526
Total177,621179,699974,9121,257,4401,501,274

Headline jobs by scenario (2023-2050 total): REF ~1.15M / CES-1 ~1.44M / CES-2 ~1.68M

OSW is the dominant job creator under CES-2: its 12.28 construction jobs/MW × 48.1 GW (2029-2050) yields 822,597 jobs in the long-term period alone — more than the entire REF long-term portfolio combined [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. II, pp.109-110, 2023].