GHG Emissions — Energy Sector (2022 Baseline)

Total energy sector greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reached 135.7 MtCO₂e in 2022 — a 4.0 percent increase from 130.4 MtCO₂e in 2021, as post-pandemic economic activity returned emissions to pre-pandemic levels. This baseline is the reference point for the Philippines’ Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) and the emission reduction trajectories in the PEP 2023-2050 CES scenarios [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, pp.58–62, 2023].

GHG values use IPCC AR5 Global Warming Potentials and 2006 IPCC Guidelines (Tier 1) emission factors.

GHG Emissions by Sector (2022)

Sector2021 (MtCO₂e)2022 (MtCO₂e)Share 2022Change
Electricity (power generation)73.976.356.2%+3.3%
Transport31.535.426.1%+12.3%
Industry12.512.99.5%+3.5%
Other sectors (services + HH + agri)12.19.97.3%−18.6%
Energy / refining losses0.41.20.9%+186.6%
Total130.4135.7100%+4.0%

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, Table 4, 2023]

Power generation is the dominant emitter at 56.2%, driven by coal-fired plants which generated 59.6% of electricity in 2022. Transport is the fastest-growing end-use emitter: full seating capacities restored for public transport, lifted mobility restrictions, and resumed tourism pushed transport GHG up 12.3% in a single year — directly motivating the EV investment emphasis in the CES scenarios.

GHG Emissions by Fuel (2022)

Fuel2021 (MtCO₂e)2022 (MtCO₂e)Share 2022Change
Coal74.075.255.4%+1.5%
Oil49.854.440.1%+9.2%
Gas6.66.14.5%−7.4%
Total130.4135.7100%+4.0%

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, Table 5, 2023]

Coal at 55.4% of total emissions is the primary target of decarbonization policy (coal moratorium, ETM). Oil’s 9.2% increase reflects transport demand recovery and makes oil the fastest-growing GHG source in 2022 by percentage. Gas emissions fell 7.4% due to Malampaya field decline.

GHG Avoidance from Mitigation Measures (2022)

The Philippines’ NDC commits to energy sector mitigation. Measures in place in 2022 avoided 18.1 MtCO₂e — equivalent to 11.77% of the hypothetical unmitigated emission level of 153.8 MtCO₂e [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, Table 6, 2023].

Mitigation Measure2021 (ktCO₂e)2022 (ktCO₂e)% of Hypothetical
Demand-side total11,70313,6308.86%
Efficiency in electricity consumption (EEC)3,3733,8672.51%
Efficiency in fossil fuel consumption (EEF)6,3817,3974.81%
Biofuel blending1,9492,3661.54%
Supply-side total4,2534,4682.91%
RE in power generation (fuel diversification)4,2534,4682.91%
Total avoidance15,99618,09811.77%

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, Table 6, 2023]

Total avoidance grew 13.4% year-on-year. Demand-side efficiency gains (EEC + EEF) account for 76% of total avoided emissions. RE in power generation — despite coal’s dominance — still avoided 4.5 MtCO₂e by displacing what would otherwise have been additional fossil fuel generation.

Key Emission Intensity Indicators (2022)

IndicatorValueChange vs 2021
Carbon intensity of energy supply2.2 tCO₂e/TOEConstant
GHG intensity of power generation0.68 tCO₂e/MWh−1.8%
GHG per unit GDP0.68 tCO₂e/PhP100k−3.3%
GHG per capita1.2 tCO₂e/person+2.7%

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.62, 2023]

GHG intensity of power generation fell 1.8% — a positive signal showing that RE growth is incrementally reducing the grid’s carbon content. GHG per unit GDP also improved (-3.3%), indicating that economic growth is partially decoupled from emissions growth.

PEP Projections by Scenario

Under REF, total GHG emissions are projected to reach 270.09 MtCO₂e by 2050 — approximately double the 2022 baseline — as fossil fuel demand grows with the economy. Under CES-1, emissions reach 199.61 MtCO₂e and under CES-2, 186.05 MtCO₂e by 2050 [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, Table 5, 2023].

CES-1 vs REF Gap (2050)

Demand and supply-side mitigation under CES-1 reduces GHG by 70.5 MtCO₂e below the REF level by 2050. The transformation sector (power generation) accounts for 69.0% of this gap, driven by RE and nuclear displacing coal and gas [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.88, 2023].

By fuel:

  • Natural gas reduction: −33.2 MtCO₂e (47.1% of gap) — gas GHG falls from 58.0 MtCO₂e (REF) to 24.8 MtCO₂e (CES-1)
  • Oil reduction: −19.9 MtCO₂e — demand savings from EV penetration
  • Coal reduction: −17.3 MtCO₂e — OSW and RE displacement

Cumulative GHG Avoidance and Reduction (2023–2050)

ScenarioCumulative Avoidance (MtCO₂e)% of Baseline
REF (current-policy mitigation)1,200.2
CES-1 (19 GW OSW + nuclear)2,173.531.6% of baseline
CES-2 (50 GW OSW + nuclear)2,458.235.8% of baseline

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.102, 2023]

The REF figure of 1,200.2 MtCO₂e includes existing mitigation measures: 50% RE generation target by 2040, B5 biodiesel from 2026, and 10% EV penetration by 2040. The gap between REF and CES-1 (973.3 MtCO₂e cumulative) is driven primarily by OSW, nuclear, and higher EV penetration (50% vs 10%).

CFPP Retirement Contribution

Voluntary retirement of CFPPs contributes a cumulative 6.1–8.1 MtCO₂e (CES-1 vs CES-2) of the total GHG reduction — a relatively small share. The dominant driver is fuel substitution in dispatch (RE/nuclear output displacing gas and coal generation), not plant retirement itself [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.102, 2023]. See Voluntary CFPP Retirement and Repurposing .

Carbon Per Capita and Carbon Intensity Trajectories

Carbon Per Capita (tCO₂e/person)

YearREFCES-1CES-2
2022 (actual)1.21.21.2
2050 (projected)1.91.41.3

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.103, 2023]

Carbon Intensity to TPES (tCO₂e/TOE)

YearREFCES-1CES-2
2022 (actual)2.22.22.2
2050 (projected)1.91.61.5

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.103, 2023]

The declining carbon intensity across all scenarios reflects the structural shift in TPES toward RE and nuclear. CES-1 achieves a 27% reduction in carbon intensity by 2050 vs. 2022; CES-2 achieves 32%.

Clean Fuel Share in TPES

Clean energy sources (RE excluding traditional biomass for cooking, plus nuclear) as a share of TPES reach [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. I, p.103, 2023]:

  • CES-1 2050: 46.7%
  • CES-2 2050: 48.3%

This demonstrates that meeting the 50%+ RE target in power generation alone is insufficient to transition the overall energy system to clean fuels — the transport and industrial sectors (which consume oil and coal directly) require additional mitigation effort beyond the power sector.

See Reference Scenario (REF) and Clean Energy Scenarios (CES-1 and CES-2) for full scenario projections.

Historical Energy Sector GHG Inventory (1994–2020)

The DOE GHG inventory follows 2006 IPCC Guidelines (Volumes 1 and 2), using two complementary approaches: the Reference Approach (top-down, using aggregate fuel supply data) and the Sectoral Approach (bottom-up, using final energy consumption data). GWPs use AR5 values (CH₄ = 28; N₂O = 265) for 2015 and 2020 inventories [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, Section B, p.16, 2023].

Table 6 — Historical GHG Emissions (GgCO₂e)

Gas / Source19942000201020152020
CO₂ — Energy Industries15,45821,12732,80351,41574,183
CO₂ — Manufacturing & Construction8,9809,01511,88713,23310,275
CO₂ — Transport15,80125,79223,72530,72228,896
CO₂ — Other Sectors7,0976,5645,9957,08511,398
CO₂ — Fugitive Emissions144110
CO₂ Sub-total47,33562,49974,425102,496124,763
CH₄ Sub-total1,7596,3872,0132,6053,046
N₂O Sub-total7177848511,0431,477
Total (Energy Sector)50,03869,67077,289106,143129,286
Total (excl. Transport)33,92343,73253,11774,89599,854

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, Table 6, p.17, 2023]

Total GHG emissions increased 146.3% from 49,999 GgCO₂e (1994) to 123,145 GgCO₂e (2020) on the CO₂ Reference Approach basis; the Sectoral Approach yields 129,286 GgCO₂e in 2020 — a 21.8% increase from 2015 [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, pp.16–18, 2023].

2020 Emissions by Sub-sector (Sectoral Approach)

Sub-sectorGgCO₂eShare
Energy Industries (electricity generation + fuel processing)74,51257.6%
— of which: electricity generation71,19795.6% of energy industries
Transport29,43122.8%
Other Sectors (commercial + residential + agri)13,68910.6%
Manufacturing & Construction11,0838.6%
Fugitive Emissions (coal mine CH₄ + oil flaring)5700.44%
Total129,286100%

[PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, pp.18–19, 2023]

Electricity generation alone (71,197 GgCO₂e) accounts for 55.1% of total energy sector GHG — making power generation the primary decarbonization lever. Road transport (26,215 GgCO₂e) is 89.1% of the transport sub-total. Cement is the largest single industrial emitter within manufacturing.

National Grid Emission Factor (NGEF)

The NGEF, established under DOE Department Order 2011-08-0009, quantifies the carbon intensity of grid-connected electricity generation. It serves as the CDM reference for energy projects and the benchmark for computing GHG avoidance from grid-connected RE [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, Section B, pp.19–21, 2023].

The Combined Margin (CM) is the weighted average of the Operating Margin (OM — plants displaced by the CDM project) and Build Margin (BM — prospective plants affected).

Table 7 — NGEF by Grid (tCO₂/MWh)

ParameterLuzon-Visayas 2015–17Luzon-Visayas 2019–21Mindanao 2015–17Mindanao 2019–21
Operating Margin (OM)0.71220.69350.77970.8522
Build Margin (BM)0.59790.74260.80450.7824
CM (wind/solar projects)0.68360.70580.78590.8348
CM (other projects)0.65500.71810.79210.8173

Source: DOE Power Statistics as of 2021 [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, Table 7, p.20, 2023]

The Mindanao grid has a consistently higher carbon intensity than Luzon-Visayas — reflecting greater fossil fuel dependence in Mindanao’s generation mix. In the Luzon-Visayas Grid, the OM fell slightly (−0.019 tCO₂/MWh) while the BM rose, resulting in a modest CM increase. The NGEF is cited in computing the RE GHG avoidance figures used in the NDC assessment.

NDC Assessment 2020–2030 (Actual Performance)

The Philippines’ NDC commits to a total reduction of 45.9 MtCO₂e for the period 2020–2030 (combined conditional + unconditional targets). Actual performance vs NDC BAU projections [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, Table 3, 2023]:

SectorNDC BAU 2022 (MtCO₂e)Actual 2022Reduction%
Transformation (power)94.1077.4416.6617.70%
Industry17.6912.944.7526.84%
Other sectors13.699.883.8127.86%
Total (ex-transport)125.48100.2625.2220.10%
Transport45.6035.4210.1822.33%
Grand Total171.08135.6835.4020.69%

Cumulative 2020–2022 reduction: 52.9 MtCO₂e — 15% above the NDC target of 45.9 MtCO₂e [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, p.11, 2023].

When RE GHG avoidance is combined with the reduction, the energy sector’s 2020–2022 total contribution rises to 197.1 MtCO₂e — approximately 3× (312%) the NDC target [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, p.12, 2023].

Projected GHG 2023–2050 by Scenario (Cumulative)

ScenarioTotal 2023–2050 (MtCO₂e)vs. REF
REF5,555.44
CES-14,564.40−991.04 (−17.8%)
CES-24,282.10−1,273.34 (−22.9%)

Energy sector only (ex-transport): REF 3,989.66 / CES-1 3,230.58 (−759 or −19%) / CES-2 2,948.53 (−1,041 or −26%) [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, Table 5, 2023].

Offset milestone: combining reduction + avoidance, the energy sector can offset its own cumulative emissions by 2033 (CES-2) and 2037 (CES-1); the REF scenario never achieves this [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, p.13, 2023].

NDC BAU cumulative (2020–2050): >8,700 MtCO₂e. PEP scenarios reduce total emissions by 55–66% vs this BAU, equivalent to 4,800–5,800 MtCO₂e [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, p.13, 2023].

Investment required for CES compliance: USD 238.70 billion (RE capacity, BESS, gas, nuclear) — the DOE frames this as a climate justice obligation on developed countries per Article 4 of the Paris Agreement [PEP 2023-2050 Vol. III, p.14, 2023]. See Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) — Philippines .